The EU AI Act Isn’t a Ceiling, It’s a Starting Line
I attended a webinar this week that didn’t focus on models or architecture, but on geopolitics. Hosted by the Copyright Clearance Center and moderated by Roy Kaufman, the session featured Anu Bradford , known for the concept of the Brussels Effect . The idea is simple, but powerful: The European Union sets regulation that often becomes a global standard. Why this matters beyond a deadline to How do we build above the minimum? We saw it with GDPR . The argument is we’re seeing it again with the EU AI Act . A lot of discussion around the 2 August 2026 obligations focuses on readiness deadlines. What stayed with me from the session was a different framing: The EU AI Act is not a ceiling. It’s a floor. That shifts the question from How do we become compliant? To How do we build above the minimum? That feels like a very different motivation - one grounded in trust, not just obligation. Why this matters more than a compliance deadline The 2 August 2026 deadline for high-ri...